About
the Instant Case, Personal blog for Bryn Davies. Law, software, gaming.
Contact
curious.jp@gmail.com
Subscribe
Subscribe to a syndicated feed of my weblog,
brought to you by the wonders of RSS.
Up
Back to the rest of my inland internet empire.
Back to the front page of the blog.
Technical
This flavour is derived from "Easy-Kubrick" for Blosxom by Michael Calleia, based on Sivert's version for Textpattern, based on Michael Heilemann's original for Wordpress.
I think I've discussed my love of the straight talking, and perhaps slightly insane, Law Lords before. Here's another example, this one from Froom v Butcher, [1976] 1 QB 286, one of the "seatbelt cases", and a clear announcement that damage reductions for contributory negligence were about who caused the harm, not who caused the accident:
... Quite a lot of people, however, think differently about seat belts. Some are like the plaintiff. They think that they would be less likely to be injured if they were thrown clear than if they were strapped in. They would be wrong. -- Lord Denning
"They would be wrong." has to be the judicial equivalent of 